Your most impressive E mount lens?

Kiwi Paul

TalkEmount All-Pro
Joined
Feb 14, 2016
Messages
1,045
Location
Stuartfield, Scotland
Real Name
Paul
Do you have a lens or lenses that really stand out and have impressed you?

There are 3 (maybe 4) lenses that have really put a smile on my face and all for the same reason more or less.
The FE35 2.8, FE55 1.8 and FE90 2.8 (the 4th being the CV10).
Yep primes.
These 3 lenses have such good resolution, micro contrast and just perform so well, I've not noticed any CA's or any other anomalies to mention. The images are just so crisp and clean and detailed, they really do stand out.
The CV10 is excellent too, quite possibly in the same class as the 3 above although it hasn't quite left me with the awe inspiring admiration I have for the 35, 55 and 90.
 

fractal

TalkEmount Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 17, 2014
Messages
2,949
Location
Southeastern PA
Real Name
Chris
I just moved up to an A7rii from an NEX-7. Haven't had enough time with my FE 55mm 1.8 yet.

With the NEX-7, my best lens (and I had a lot of them) was easily the Sony Zeiss 24mm 1.8. Not just the image quality, color and rendering - which was great, but also the versatility of the lens. "Carry around", landscape, environmental portrait, low light, and with a close min focusing distance and 1:4 reproduction can be used as a quasi-macro. Just a terrific lens that sings in front of the Sony 24mpx APS-C sensor.
 

addieleman

Passionate amateur
Joined
Nov 13, 2012
Messages
3,711
Location
Netherlands
Real Name
Ad Dieleman
There isn't one in my line-up (see signature) that really stands out. In terms of usefulness the FE 4/24-70mm is the clear winner, very flexible range and high-quality images once I got to know how to avoid its weaknesses. The FE 2.8/35 is very good and I like it a lot because it's small, light and has a lens hood that hardly adds to its overall size. Paired to the A7R2, this lens gives you full-frame goodness in a compact and very powerful package. At the bottom of the list would be the FE 1.4/35mm: it offers great image quality, but it is so darn large and heavy.

In fact, I like all my native FE lenses. The only one I didn't like was the FE 28-70mm and that one was sold long ago and replaced by the 24-70mm.
 

Mus Aziz

TalkEmount All-Pro
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
1,306
Real Name
Mus
I've owned a few FE lenses at one time or another (55/1.8, 28/2, 16-35/4 and Loxia 35) and none are as impressive as my legacy Minolta MC Rokkor 50/1.4. Don't get me wrong. They're sharp, etc but I just prefer the rendering of that old Minolta glass. I have yet to try the Sony Zeiss 50/1.4 though.

At the moment I'm digging my Sigma 35 Art and looking forward to the arrival of the Sigma 20/1.4 Art ;)
 

davect01

Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
8,112
Location
Fountain Hills, AZ
Real Name
Dave
I love my 28-70mm and the 50mm on my A6000.

The 55-210mm and 20mm serve their purpose but are nothing special
 

Nexnut

TalkEmount Top Veteran
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
800
Location
somewhere betwixt here and now
Real Name
Ken
I've owned a few FE lenses at one time or another (55/1.8, 28/2, 16-35/4 and Loxia 35) and none are as impressive as my legacy Minolta MC Rokkor 50/1.4. Don't get me wrong. They're sharp, etc but I just prefer the rendering of that old Minolta glass. I have yet to try the Sony Zeiss 50/1.4 though.

At the moment I'm digging my Sigma 35 Art and looking forward to the arrival of the Sigma 20/1.4 Art ;)
Same here, I've owned some, tried a few more but generally prefer the not too clinical rendering of most of my older lenses.
 

WNG

TalkEmount Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 12, 2014
Messages
3,953
Location
Arrid Zone-A, USA
Real Name
Will
Non-Sony native mounts I'm very impressed with are my Rokinon/Samyang FE-mount 12mm f/2.8 Fish-eye, and 14mm f/2.8 UWA. At these focal lengths, the manual focusing isn't an issue. Outstanding performance for the amount of investment. Other than not being able to install fliters (easily), little to complain about.

In APS-C, Sony's SEL 50-f/1.8 is a winner in my books. What they achieved for the asking price, is remarkable. A must-have for the NEX/a6xxx shooter.
 

Hawkman

TalkEmount All-Pro
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
1,242
Location
Virginia, USA
Real Name
Steve
While I like each of my E-mount native lenses (all APS-C so far), and each has their own particular strengths, one stands out at the moment, and that is the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 DC DN C. At f/1.4 it's the fastest AF APS-C lens currently available making it great for low light. It's sharp in the center at 1.4, and very sharp across most of the frame stopped down just a bit. And it's a very useable normal focal length for most of my purposes. Prior to it I would have said the Sony E 50/1.8 OSS was my favorite.

(See also this post on my new blog... My Favorite E-Mount Lenses… So Far )
 

Alex66

TalkEmount Regular
Joined
Dec 23, 2014
Messages
91
The E mount 50mm OSS on the NEx6 has been steller for live band shots and the odd portrait. The 55mm 1.8 FE "Zeiss" however is the lens that has caused extreme delight, I have always been a 50mm guy and I can't think of one that is so good that I have used. I have had at various points the Leica f2, the 1.4 OM, the 1.6 Fuji X (film) various Canon and Nikon versions, the Jupiter 8 Zeiss copy and the Contax MF 1.8 and this beats all. Actually of the others the most enjoyable were the Fuji and the Jupiter 8, the latter less than perfect but quite beautiful rendering of people especially, the Fuji was very sharp as was the Contax mount but I preferred the Fuji for some reason. Both the Jupiter 8 and the 55mm are Sonars so perhaps that has a lot to do with it, I bought the A7 to use the 55mm having liked everything I saw about this lens and knowing that it would be used a lot. If I was reduced to just this combo I would not really mind or notice so much, over 90% of my work is a 50mm equivalent, to the point of looking at shots with zooms having been zoomed to around that area.
 

NickCyprus

Super Moderator
Joined
Oct 11, 2012
Messages
6,747
Location
Cyprus
Real Name
Nick
I thought the thread title said "E-mount lens"
Adapted lenses are not e-mount since they require an adapter to fit :D

Anyway, for me to answer this thread it requires one owning a lot of e-mount lenses (so he can have a large sample of comparison) and since I don't own a lot (I only own three, used to own 6 with my apsc lenses), I feel somehow inadequate to answer. I'm sure there are more e-mount lenses better than the ones I own...

Sorry if I missed the point of this thread.
 

Amamba

TalkEmount All-Pro
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
1,085
Location
SE MI
Not really, tbh. I don't buy expensive and bulky FE lenses because I want to use the camera in different conditions - rain, sand, off the boat, in the streets - and not worry that it may get damaged or stolen. Also, in the past couple of years I've developed a very strong adversity towards carrying a large and heavy camera. I pretty much stopped using my A-mount lenses because of this. SELP18105 is the heaviest and largest lens that lives on my Nex, and only because there's really no alternative to it. This is not because of any physical issues, I just don't want to be a glass-carrying camel any more, I'd rather sacrifice a little IQ for convenience.

So, all of my lenses are a compromise. They are tools. When I shot Canon, I did have a couple lenses that were special - like the EF85/1.8 which I think was a better lens that it's much more expensive faster brother. I could always tell that lens by it's bokeh and colors. I don't have a single lens like this in Sony lineup, certainly not in their APS-C offerings.

That said, I am fine with most of my lenses. They allow me to get photos that are decent enough for my use (I never print) and keep my photo bag small and expendable.
 

Amamba

TalkEmount All-Pro
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
1,085
Location
SE MI
Yes, that's how I started to feel. We like to travel as a family, and carrying the bag full of glass is really interfering with my ability to enjoy the trip, I feel like I have a job to do rather than just looking at places and occasionally taking a photo or two.

When we went to the Czech Republic last year, I only put three lenses in my bag - the 18105 and 16/2.8 with UWA adapter, plus 1650 as a backup. Never felt I was short on glass.
 

Alex66

TalkEmount Regular
Joined
Dec 23, 2014
Messages
91
I thought the thread title said "E-mount lens"
Adapted lenses are not e-mount since they require an adapter to fit :D

Anyway, for me to answer this thread it requires one owning a lot of e-mount lenses (so he can have a large sample of comparison) and since I don't own a lot (I only own three, used to own 6 with my apsc lenses), I feel somehow inadequate to answer. I'm sure there are more e-mount lenses better than the ones I own...

Sorry if I missed the point of this thread.
I think I went on a major detour there, I can waffle on for ages about lovely 50's.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WNG

soeren

TalkEmount Top Veteran
Joined
Dec 12, 2014
Messages
815
Location
Næstved, Denmark
Real Name
Soeren
I'm amazed neither the rokinon/samyang 12mm f2 nor the Sigma 60mm f2,8 are mentioned yet.
The 24mm Sony is a great lens but at that price it darned well better be. I find it amazing how much you get in cheap lenses like the 12mm samyang and especially the 60mm sigma
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom