I bought both of these lenses recently. While both perform really well, I am not sure if I should keep both. For reference, I use an a6000. The 24mm takes great pictures, but for indoor shots of my kids, sometimes I find it to be a little too wide. While it does focus fairly close, I also think it distorts some features when brought in really closely. The 32mm is really nice as well. It is a great focal length and takes nice pictures. The auto focus is a little bit slower (and noisy) and it doesn't focus as closely as the 24mm. I read a ton of discussion on which is better as the go-to prime lens (35mm vs 50mm). Now that I have both, I am a little undecided about which I like more. Does anyone else have both and can convince me if I should keep one or the other? Are they sufficiently different to keep both? My other lenses are the kit lens, the 50mm 1.8 Sony, and the 55-210 Sony. Does it make sense to sell the 24mm or 32mm to fund a 16-70 purchase? You only need a couple of good primes right? Even going on trips I don't like having to switch between too many lenses.