Show Photos with high ISO

[robertmwilliams]

I think I did everything I could to make this shot NOT come out at all.
Manual focus with an adapted 30+ year old macro lens, no image stabilization, hand held, 1/60th second, ISO 3200, through glass and no flash.
Its not great by any stretch, but it is serviceable.


Durham Nature Science Center - 12 - SONY NEX-5N by Robert M. Williams, on Flickr

 

[Amin Sabet]

Not an easy one to get, for sure. Very nice!

 

[robertmwilliams]

ISO 3200 with the 18-55mm kit lens on my NEX-5n
The more I use this camera with high ISO the less afraid of doing so I become.

Dixie - 6 - NEX-5N - E 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 OSS by Robert M. Williams, on Flickr

 

[Phoenix]

Nice image Robert, I think I'm also being influenced by Dixie as she is practising one of my favourite hobbies

 

[Amin Sabet]

Very cute kitty, and impressive high ISO performance. There is no greater challenge for a sensor at high ISO than dark fur in low light.

 

[jebuskrust]

This is one picture shot through 3 layers of glass (security windows, etc) with almost no light at all but just few lamps behind me. ISO 1600
Picture is SOOC

Become a member for free to remove site ads and see EXIF info for images.

 

[Amin Sabet]

Just a Halloween snap of my two boys, Harry and Darth (NEX-C3 ISO 1600 pushed during RAW processing):

Become a member for free to remove site ads and see EXIF info for images.

 

[hodad66]

great examples.... thanks all!

 

[Dioptrick]

Low light, high ISO, This is where the NEX really shines.

+1

... and add to that a fast lens, you can get away with hand-holding night shots.

 

[dbmiller]

ISO 6400 sample

Camera was on table so that lower ISO values possible, but at the cost of slower shutter times.

This was f4 @1/40th

Become a member for free to remove site ads and see EXIF info for images.

 

[Dioptrick]

^ Wow, I've never gone beyond ISO3200 on the NEX, thinking that's the usable threshold - but my, my... ISO6400 is still decent!!

I wonder if Pete (the OP) ever did get a NEX in the end?

 

[unlo]

Become a member for free to remove site ads and see EXIF info for images.

been playing with some new software / techniques for processing 'high iso' images

 

[AlwaysOnAuto]

Become a member for free to remove site ads and see EXIF info for images.

I guess 'high' ISO is all relative.

 

[Thad E Ginathom]

been playing with some new software / techniques for processing 'high iso' images

I don't know whether I'm more astonished that you photographed that tomato, or that I never thought of photographing a tomato! Super shot. If I can't think outside my box, then I need a bigger box to think in. Seeing pictures like this helps me to know there's a whole wide world out there

 

[Richard Crowe]

Oliver in dog bed beneath my desk. I shot this at ISO 51,200 using the Sony A7iii and Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 lens: 1/640 second at f/5.6. Global noise reduction in NIK Dfine-2 and a bit of selective brightening over eyes...

Become a member for free to remove site ads and see EXIF info for images.

Although I would never shoot a serious image at ISO 51,200, this one is surprisingly not that bad!

This one is at a ridiculous 204,800 using 1/3,200 at f/5.6

Become a member for free to remove site ads and see EXIF info for images.

I am of an age when I first began photography the fastest Kodak film was Super-XX at an astounding ASA (= ISO) 125

Actually, when I pushed Super-XX one stop to ASA 250 - the results were not much worse than the above

 

[Richard Crowe]

Become a member for free to remove site ads and see EXIF info for images.

Oliver and Robin at ISO 6300 with A6600 and 70-350mm lens

 

[Biro]

Oliver in dog bed beneath my desk. I shot this at ISO 51,200 using the Sony A7iii and Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 lens: 1/640 second at f/5.6. Global noise reduction in NIK Dfine-2 and a bit of selective brightening over eyes...
View attachment 110515
Although I would never shoot a serious image at ISO 51,200, this one is surprisingly not that bad!

This one is at a ridiculous 204,800 using 1/3,200 at f/5.6
View attachment 110516

I am of an age when I first began photography the fastest Kodak film was Super-XX at an astounding ASA (= ISO) 125

Actually, when I pushed Super-XX one stop to ASA 250 - the results were not much worse than the above

Now THAT's high ISO!

 

[Petrochemist]

View attachment 110453
been playing with some new software / techniques for processing 'high iso' images

You've revived a 8-9 year old thread - when ISO 1000 was reasonably high, for the A7ii it's not even remotely high. I only use below ISO 640 if I need long exposures or very wide apertures...