Plethora of lenses are announced

Richard Crowe

TalkEmount Top Veteran
Joined
Sep 14, 2018
Messages
537
Both Sony and Sigma as well as other manufacturers such as Samyang/Rokinon are adding lenses to the e-mount line at an almost a weekly basis. However the lens I would like to see is one for crop sensor cameras somewhat equivalent to the Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS in a size compatible with the Sony APSC line of cameras.
I have carried a pair of Canon APSC cameras all over the world with the 17-55mm f/2.8 IS and 70-200mm f/4L IS lenses and have never lacked for a focal length.
I now shoot with a combination of Sony A6400 and A6500 cameras. Adding fast prime like the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 and perhaps the 50mm f/1.8 or 85mm f/1.8 to the 17-55mm and 70-200mm lenses would make a really light weight general purpose travel kit.
A third party 1.4x TC which could mate with the 70-200mm f/4 G OSS lens would put this kit even one step ahead for travel use.
I have all the above glass except the elusive 17-55mm f.2.8 and of course the non-existent 1.4x TC...
Lenses have been introduced at such rapidity that I may have missed one that is a close approximation or equivalence to the 17-55mm. Is there such a lens available from any manufacturer?
 
Last edited:

WNG

TalkEmount Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 12, 2014
Messages
4,072
Location
Arrid Zone-A, USA
Real Name
Will
No, there isn't anything that fast yet for Sony ASP-C. The closest is the Sony-Zeiss 16-70 f/4. Some people try to adapt the Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 for Canon EF.
The upcoming Tamron release of the FE 17-28mm f/2.8 may be the closest, but it's for full-frame. But has the speed you want.
If you have included your 50 f/1.8 and 85 f/1.8, your focal range is still basically covered.
 

Richard Crowe

TalkEmount Top Veteran
Joined
Sep 14, 2018
Messages
537
Although I have heard some good things about the Sigma 18-35mm adapted to the e-mount cameras, I am not really fond of adapted lenses. I have not used one that has the AF capability of a native Sony e-mount lens; and I have tried several different adapters with multiple lens types......
 

bdbits

TalkEmount Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
2,094
Real Name
Bob
There is the now somewhat ancient Sony 18-55mm but not fast at all, variable aperture 3.5/5.6. It was pretty widely panned as a kit lens, though I do not recall it being terrible. Probably not what you are looking for anyway.
 

Richard Crowe

TalkEmount Top Veteran
Joined
Sep 14, 2018
Messages
537
No. I am looking for a lens with at least a constant f/2.8 aperture. I just did a survey of 154 shots that I kept from a couple of days in Istanbul shooting with a pair of Canon APSC cameras with 17-55mm f/2.8 IS and 70-200mm f/4L IS lenses mounted.
111 were shot with the 17-55mm with a goodly number at f/2.8. 43 were shot using the 70-200mm f/4L IS lens with many shot at f/4.
Wide focal lengths of 17-30mm (27-48mm equivalent) counted for 58 shots. Medium to longish focal lengths 31-55mm (49.6 to 88mm equivalent) counted for 53 images.
Using the 70-200mm 70-120mm counted for 32 images and over 120mm counted for 11 images...
 

addieleman

Passionate amateur
Joined
Nov 13, 2012
Messages
3,766
Location
Netherlands
Real Name
Ad Dieleman
I am not really fond of adapted lenses.
No. I am looking for a lens with at least a constant f/2.8 aperture.
You're out of luck, there's no native f/2.8 standard zoom lens for Sony APS-C E-mount. Going Fuji X-system is your best bet IMHO, it offers an extensive range of lenses, among which a 2.8/16-55mm. Sony's priority with lenses is with their FF line-up.
 

sven karma

TalkEmount Top Veteran
Joined
Oct 5, 2016
Messages
825
Real Name
mark evans
There's the m43 Olympus 12-40/2.8? I loved that lens.
 

Richard Crowe

TalkEmount Top Veteran
Joined
Sep 14, 2018
Messages
537
I actually did a bit of research on those same 154 photos that I broke down the focal lengths on. I was absolutely shocked to learn that 91% of these images were shot at an f/4 or smaller aperture while the 9% that were shot at a wider aperture could easily have been shot with a slightly higher ISO which would have made the f/4 a viable aperture for all my images...
I will admit however, that I did no specific portrait work nor did I do any night photography on this trip.
Actually I could have used the 18-105mm f/4 for the vast majority of my imagery...
 

quezra

TalkEmount All-Pro
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
1,053
Well we know Sony is pushing people to FF and this is probably the main reason there's never been a fast zoom for APS-C. Equivalent of 16-47 or 16-70 f/2.8, are the 24-70 or 24-105 f/4s. If they designed either of those lenses for APS-C they would be (unsurprisingly) almost the same size and likely the same price (see: Canon). Now I've got the 24-105, I never leave it out of my bag because it's too damn useful.
 

Latest posts

Links on this page may be to our affiliates. Sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
TalkEmount is a fan site and not associated with Sony Corporation.
Forum post reactions by Twemoji: https://github.com/twitter/twemoji
Copyright © 2011-2019 Amin Forums, LLC
Top Bottom