After using my NEX F3 for a year, I've decided that I would like to either: 1). Upgrade my system to the NEX-6 or 2). Keep the F3 and purchase an EVF The main reason I would upgrade is the fact that the NEX 6 has an EVF. The screen is terrible to use in direct sunlight so it's a pain to deal with some days. Also, the EVF is on the body, allowing me to still use an external flash. I do use the accessory port for flash on the F3 so I don't know how I feel to having to choose between flash/EVF. Is the IQ/Noise performance equal for both cameras? I've seen specs on DxO that both have equal low light performance, DR and Color. I have this feeling that the F3 and 6 share the same sensor. Anyone here can give me a comparison between the two? Is it really negligible between the two? Also, on a strange note. I dislike the fact that the base ISO of most NEX's are 200 and it feels very grainy even with low NR. I shot Canon and I always trusted ISO100 to be sharp and crisp. Does the 6 have ISO 100 and how does it performance against the base ISO of the other NEX's. PS: The A6000 is a very, very viable option and it's such a good camera but I don't really think that I need a lot of it's features. I completely use MF so AF performance doesn't matter. Even if did get a native E-Mount, I wouldn't mind dealing with the 6's focusing. 24mp is overkill for my work (Largest print is 16x20) 11fps is on par to the 10fps on the 6 and I would rather get a used NEX 6 for a cheaper price than a new a6000 (Trying to save if I can) Unless some one can convince me other wise the A6000 is currently not one of my options.