A buddy of mine in a camera store let me try out the SL last week for bit. My initial usage impressions are quite different to Steve Huffs and only further enforce my original impressions when it was first announced. Why would somebody chose this over the Sony a7ii or A7rii other than the fancy badge? For me it's a major let down on many fronts. I simply do not understand it's purpose or appeal at the price point that it is at. The Sony A7ii (nevermind A7rii) is an overall better proposition for a working photographer IMHO assuming both were the same price. At least with the M bodies you are buying an exclusive shooting experience than can somewhat go a ways to justify the higher price differential yet the shooting experience with the SL is no different to the Sonys. In many ways for me it's worse as the ergonomics are horrible and the sensor is no better (technically not as good) as the A7ii nevermind A7rii. It also lacks IBIS and PDAF so from a versatility perspective (keeping your shutter lower longer) and the ability to use third party lens adapters with autofocus it will likely be very limited. The one thing it definitely has going for it is a lovely EVF and menu system. The EVF in particular is absolutely amazing full stop. Has anybody else tried it? Similar impression, experience? Any comments?