Konica 135mm f3.2

Discussion in 'Adapted Lenses' started by AK47J, Mar 26, 2014.

  1. AK47J

    AK47J TalkEmount Veteran

    231
    Jan 31, 2014
    Central Oregon

    Attached Files:

  2. AK47J

    AK47J TalkEmount Veteran

    231
    Jan 31, 2014
    Central Oregon
    7? not 5 or 10 like how every single speedo ever made is marked out, but 7, in between?
    DSC06740.
    DSC06760.
    DSC06776.
    DSC06804.
     

    Attached Files:

  3. AK47J

    AK47J TalkEmount Veteran

    231
    Jan 31, 2014
    Central Oregon

    Attached Files:

    • Like Like x 1
  4. davect01

    davect01 Super Moderator

    Aug 20, 2011
    Fountain Hills, AZ
    Dave
    Some fun shots from what looks like a nice lens.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. HabsFan

    HabsFan TalkEmount Veteran

    259
    Apr 10, 2013
    Ontario, CAN
    Nice lens! I actually have an opportunity to get the f2.5 version of this lens but I think it would just be way to big judging by the size of your 3.2.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Zanner

    Zanner TalkEmount Veteran

    395
    Aug 19, 2013
    Wisconsin, USA
    Suzanne
    Great shots! LOL on the specificity of the mileage. I'm not sure I would be physically capable of keeping my car at 7mph. I think just letting of the brake would cause me to reach that quickly!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. AK47J

    AK47J TalkEmount Veteran

    231
    Jan 31, 2014
    Central Oregon
    I chose the 3.2 because it has the shortest minimum focus of the 135s and it's fairly compact. Yes the 2.5 is bulky but if you can get one for a good deal don't pass it up. Hell, if you don't like it, I might be interested.
     
  8. AK47J

    AK47J TalkEmount Veteran

    231
    Jan 31, 2014
    Central Oregon
    I didn't notice the creepy silhouette of myself in Tali's eyes until I got the photo onto the computer. Armless dark figure, looks very "X-files" to me.
    DSC07300.

    Low light shot of Tyreal from across the room
    DSC07284.
     
    • Like Like x 2