Help choosing a MF tele zoom lens (MD mount)

Discussion in 'Adapted Lenses' started by Grisu_HDH, Nov 14, 2013.

  1. Grisu_HDH

    Grisu_HDH TalkEmount Veteran

    Dec 16, 2012
    Southern Germany
    Dear Nexians.
    Want to have a travel tele zoom for a long time now...
    I want to have the e-mount AF Tamron 18-200mm F/3.5-6.3 Di III VC but it's too expensive... :crying:
    But can I choose an adapted MF MD mount lens instead???
    And if yes, which would be the best to get???
    I picked some on the bay to ask for your opinions about them:
    - Tokina AT-X 3,5-4,5/35-200mm Minolta MD --- 59,90 EUR
    - Super Albinar Auto MC 1:3.3 / f: 200mm / Minolta MD ---39,00 EUR
    - Vivitar 3,8/75-200 f. MD --- 79,00 EUR
    - Minolta MD: 200mm Auto Beroflex 1:3,5 ---69,00 EUR

    As you can see all are fixed priced with the possibility to offer a price suggestion...

    Or am I on the wrong path to choose a MF for a travel zoom due to missing image stabilization??? :confused: :confused: :confused: 

    Any help is appreciated...
  2. xXx1

    xXx1 TalkEmount All-Pro

    Jan 15, 2013
    Look for Vivitar 70-150mm/3.8 too. It is small and optically pretty good. I am going to take one to Barcelona in two weeks. (With Sigma 19mm&30mm&Minolta 35-70mm/3.5).
  3. addieleman

    addieleman Passionate amateur Subscribing Member

    Nov 13, 2012
    Ad Dieleman
    The Minolta MD (Rokkor) 200/4 is quite good and I've seen those for € 50 or less. Zoom lenses? Minolta MD 75-150/4 is excellent, as is the MD 50-135/3.5, both are not too expensive. I manage hand-held shots with these two in good light. I wouldn't go for the 75-200/4.5 nor the 70-210/4, quite heavy and more difficult to use succesfully. I'd say that everything over 135mm without stabilization is a challenge.
    • Like Like x 2
  4. NickCyprus

    NickCyprus Super Moderator

    Oct 11, 2012
    Markus I'm slightly confused.
    First you said you want a tele zoom and then on the examples you wrote 3 out of 4 are fixed tele lenses...

    Tamron or SEL 18-200 is zoom lens that goes from wide (18mm) to tele (200mm) and I don't think you'll find a same quality lens (plus they are stabilizied!!!) in the adapted lens market
    I think good quality adapted tele zooms cover focal lenghts of more like mid tele to tele (ie. 50-70mm to 135-200mm) but my opinion for those is that in the end of the day you will end up missing the wide end for what you're looking for (an all-in-one lens)...
  5. Grisu_HDH

    Grisu_HDH TalkEmount Veteran

    Dec 16, 2012
    Southern Germany
    It's ok to be confused...
    Seems like i'm confused too...
    Cause you're right! I want a TELE ZOOM lens and chose wrong ones... :'(
  6. davect01

    davect01 Super Moderator Subscribing Member

    Aug 20, 2011
    Fountain Hills, AZ
    I have that above mentioned 70-150mm Vivitar.

    Love it.


  7. michelb

    michelb TalkEmount Veteran

    Oct 27, 2013
    Greater Montreal area in Quebec, Canada
    Michel Brien
    I am also confused

    In your signature it says you have 18-55 AND 55-210

    Why would you want
    - Tokina AT-X 3,5-4,5/35-200mm Minolta MD //////Already covered by your 18-55/55-210 combo
    - Super Albinar Auto MC 1:3.3 / f: 200mm / Minolta MD /////// F3,3 opening but still same as your 55-210
    - Vivitar 3,8/75-200 f. MD ////// F 3,8 aperture but still covered by your 55-210
    - Minolta MD: 200mm Auto Beroflex 1:3,5 /////// F3.5 aperture but also covered by your 55-210

    I hear the 55-210 is at its best around 200mm so you are gambling on the quality of these at around 200mm ( they may be weak due to age, coatings a little antique and mis-adapted to digital sensors and maybe even unusable due to chromatic aberrations at wide apertures
  8. Amamba

    Amamba TalkEmount All-Pro

    Apr 13, 2013
    SE MI
    I must either drink less coffee than Ad, or else my standards are lower... but I have managed to use 70-200/4 handheld with no problems. Did take a bit of getting used to.

    This was taken handheld, in a dimly lit room using built in flash bounced off the ceiling.

    untitled shoot-005 by BugsDaddy, on Flickr

    And that's in good light:

    2013-09-008-2 by BugsDaddy, on Flickr

    I think 70-210/4 Macro is awesome.

    Another tele lens I have that's even easier to use is Kiron 80-200/4.5 with Zoom lock. It's a bit smaller and has a very pleasant, creamy bokeh. But it's not as sharp as the Minolta, although sharp enough. I mainly use Kiron for portraits, because of the bokeh and colors. This was taken with Kiron:

    DSC04951.jpg by BugsDaddy, on Flickr
    • Like Like x 4
  9. Grisu_HDH

    Grisu_HDH TalkEmount Veteran

    Dec 16, 2012
    Southern Germany
    @Michel: Ever heard of the JOMLS? -> Just-One-More-Lens-Syndrom??? :rolleyes: 
    I want to add a bit more zoom possibilities to my equipment and I love experimenting with lenses...
    I know that the modern Tamron e-mount would be the best but it's just available for more than 500 EUR here...

    I searched the bay for some
    - Minolta 75-150 4.0
    and I also found
    - Vivitar 1 70-210 1:2,8-4,0
    - Exakta 70-210 1:2,8-4,0 Macro

    What would suitable prices for these be?
    Are they worth the money? As far as I know the Vivitar 1s are very good but also very heavy/large...!?
  10. xXx1

    xXx1 TalkEmount All-Pro

    Jan 15, 2013
    I wouldn't call Vivitar Series 1 70-210s travel telezooms. They are pretty good even by modern standards but heavy.
  11. Amamba

    Amamba TalkEmount All-Pro

    Apr 13, 2013
    SE MI
    A decent 2x TC is $15 on eBay, as long as you have good light I found the results to be very acceptable - you do lose contrast, but that's fixable in PP. Mine is Kiron MC7. So here's a cheap Tele option for you to experiment with.

    Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.