For the A7ii I have every focal length I need in adapted glass (24/2.8, 28/2, 40/1.8, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 135/2.8, etc. And in my Micro Four Thirds system, which I will keep, I use the same lenses adapted, as well as several native auto focus primes. Plus due to its overall value, I’ll probably get the 28-70 kit lens regardless, eventually. So, I don’t necessarily need a native FE lens, but, you know, of course I want one! A prime with great subject separation; hopefully that will match the wide-open performance of, well, all of my native M43s lenses (think the Panasonic 20/1.7 or 42/1.7). Since they announced it I’ve been watching the Zeiss Batis 85/1.8. But the Sony 85/1.8 is a lot cheaper! Why would I want one or the other? And of course there’s the 55/1.8. I think I’d be happy having that FL as well. How much better is that than the new basic 50/1.8? Night and day? I sure do like the $200 price tag! I guess I should read some reviews of the cheap lens before asking. My Pentax 50mm f1.7 is a pretty good lens that I use at f2.2 and up. If this $200 lens beats that, I’m happy! A 35mm might be on my list but I’d want it to be faster than 2.8. And the 135/2.8 would be a lot of fun as well, but I’m not sure if it would get that much use to warrant buying another 135mm lens (I have 4 or 5 of them!). So, I guess, is the cheap 50/1.8 satisfactory? Is the focusing better or worse than the M43s 20/1.7? If it sucks, how’s the Sony branded 85/1.8? If that's good and the cheap 50 isn't, it'd be between that and the 55/1.8. Any other prime you guys would recommend? Thanks!