'Battle Of The Mirrorless Part 1 (Low Light Performance)

Discussion in 'Other Systems' started by RT_Panther, Dec 15, 2012.

  1. freddytto

    freddytto TalkEmount All-Pro

    Dec 2, 2011
    Puebla, Mexico
    The Nex still remain the best in low light conditions.
  2. RT_Panther

    RT_Panther TalkEmount Veteran

    Aug 9, 2011
    Fuji systems are missing though...
  3. Bill

    Bill TalkEmount Veteran

    Oct 22, 2012
    Brisbane, Australia
    That's the great thing about us old guys: We're so grateful for whatever we get. I still think pushing TRI-X to (it was ASA then) 1600 was the coolest thing. It's even my tactic these days -- I convert to B&W and use the noise as grainy "atmosphere."

    If I was looking for great high ISO results, however, I'd probably be thinking about a FUJI.
  4. Phoenix

    Phoenix TalkEmount Top Veteran

    Aug 25, 2011
    Melbourne, Australia
    Phoenix Gonzales
    ASA, wow that's a term I haven't heard for a long time, well at least when I'm not looking at the settings on my SRT. But I know exactly what you mean, shooting at 1600 used to be such a novelty.
  5. Luckypenguin

    Luckypenguin TalkEmount Regular

    Sep 26, 2012
    Brisbane, Australia
    Looking purely at sensor performance they certainly are, although as was noted above he didn't have a Fuji present for this test which would likely provide some stiff competition.
  6. Dioptrick

    Dioptrick TalkEmount All-Pro

    Feb 4, 2012
    New Zealand
    It's interesting... but as far as battles go, it's not one I need nor care to take part of... :D
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.