'Battle Of The Mirrorless Part 1 (Low Light Performance)

Discussion in 'Other Systems' started by RT_Panther, Dec 15, 2012.

  1. freddytto

    freddytto TalkEmount All-Pro

    Dec 2, 2011
    Puebla, Mexico
    The Nex still remain the best in low light conditions.
  2. RT_Panther

    RT_Panther TalkEmount Veteran

    Aug 9, 2011
    Fuji systems are missing though...
  3. Bill

    Bill TalkEmount Veteran

    Oct 22, 2012
    Brisbane, Australia
    Real Name:
    That's the great thing about us old guys: We're so grateful for whatever we get. I still think pushing TRI-X to (it was ASA then) 1600 was the coolest thing. It's even my tactic these days -- I convert to B&W and use the noise as grainy "atmosphere."

    If I was looking for great high ISO results, however, I'd probably be thinking about a FUJI.
  4. Phoenix

    Phoenix TalkEmount Top Veteran

    Aug 25, 2011
    Melbourne, Australia
    Real Name:
    Phoenix Gonzales
    ASA, wow that's a term I haven't heard for a long time, well at least when I'm not looking at the settings on my SRT. But I know exactly what you mean, shooting at 1600 used to be such a novelty.
  5. Luckypenguin

    Luckypenguin TalkEmount Regular

    Sep 26, 2012
    Brisbane, Australia
    Real Name:
    Looking purely at sensor performance they certainly are, although as was noted above he didn't have a Fuji present for this test which would likely provide some stiff competition.
  6. Dioptrick

    Dioptrick TalkEmount All-Pro

    Feb 4, 2012
    New Zealand
    It's interesting... but as far as battles go, it's not one I need nor care to take part of... :D